![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/d58cd9_cd56846c3d474b94861402b38baf2dd7.jpg/v1/fill/w_288,h_180,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/d58cd9_cd56846c3d474b94861402b38baf2dd7.jpg)
JOHN W. EVERT | Mechanical Engineering Technology
Results
Initial testing of static mass as well as moment of inertia produced a 23.8% decrease in the moment of inertia and 1.55lbs mass reduction.
Location on vehicle is of paramount concern. Given a 75%/25% front/rear brake bias, the front is subjected to 123kW of kinetic energy whereas the rear is 41kW. For On-Vehicle testing, rotors were mounted to the front axle.
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/d58cd9_583daafefec44fd187b4b8610caf8470.jpg/v1/fill/w_409,h_92,al_c,q_80,enc_auto/d58cd9_583daafefec44fd187b4b8610caf8470.jpg)
After 7-second cool down period, temperature entering the braking zone was 163°C for the vented iron rotor and 99°C for the fabricated rotor respectively, ΔT = 64°C .
Testing was necessary to retrieve a convection coefficient in order to calculate remaining thermal energy for a new ΔT in the next braking event.
Failure of fabricated rotors occurred on Lap 11 of Session 3 (74 total laps) due to warping (495°C peak temp).
Driver was instructed to drive more aggressively and brake deeper into deceleration zones since fabricated rotors were performing satisfactorily in sessions 1 and 2.
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/d58cd9_832eac40c59245d5ade9a7a3cd0707c3.jpg/v1/fill/w_600,h_432,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/d58cd9_832eac40c59245d5ade9a7a3cd0707c3.jpg)